Sometimes, people who hate Rolex are referred to as as snobs.
I've never thought of myself as a watch snob -- for example, I completely agree with a lot of both the negative AND the positive things which are said about Invicta (negative: their marketing strategy of giving their watches MSRP's 4 times what they intend to sell the watch for, and then pretending that, TODAY ONLY, they're offering an incredible deal, when it's the everyday deal; and using way too much gold plating.
Positive: making some watches which actually function pretty well, and drawing the attention of a lot of first-time watch owners to a wonderful hobby) -- but it's very hard for me to imagine myself ever wearing a Rolex. I would much rather be seen wearing the garish Invicta in that photo.
As loyal readers of this blog know, this represents a complete change from 5 years ago, when I lusted after the platinum Rolex Daytona. What happened in those 5 years? I've learned a lot about watches. I know Rolexes are good watches, but today, they're
overpriced to the point where it seems to me that you either have not
know very much about watches, or ignore a lot of what you know, in order
to shell out that much for a Rolex, when you can always, ALWAYS get a far
superior watch for the same money. I just can't separate my reaction to the marketing and the prices from my reaction to the actual watches.
If that means I'm a watch snob, well then, I supposed I've become a watch snob. Even though my annual income is less than the average selling price for an entry-level Rolex, which is much, much higher than the MSRP for that Rolex.
I personally don't think it's
snobbery, it's actually concern about people being ripped off, and
people investing in a risky bubble -- assuming that the Rolex bubble
actually will burst at some point. And of course, it's POSSIBLE that it actually will NEVER burst. Financial bubbles, by defintion, are built on irrationality, and irrationality has never run to a sensible timetable.
No comments:
Post a Comment