Showing posts with label chess compared to basketball. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chess compared to basketball. Show all posts

Saturday, June 24, 2023

How to Fix Basketball

Anyone who compares basketball to chess is an idiot , but especially if they're talking about the last few minutes -- on the clock -- of a close game, when everything slows down and becomes excruciatingly boring, completely unlike chess. 

We can all agree that it's getting worse: the first 46 of the game clock's 48 minutes might be over in an hour and a half, but those last 2 minutes could take another half hour. 


And if we don't stand up and cry, "Enough!" it could soon be an hour, or longer.

And unlike those prima-dona egocentric head coaches who think they're like chess players, and are making this last part of the game longer and longer -- unlike them, most of us actually have stuff to do after the game. Other than those coaches and a few particularly silly fans, nobody finds these long, slow exchanges of time outs and fouls left to give, and wasting as much time as possible at every turn, exciting! Time outs are allowed to go on for much longer than they're supposed to. and when was the last time you saw a so-called "thirty second timeout' which was over in 30 seconds? 

But it's not just that: every time the clock stops, late in a close game, these bonehead coaches who have never cared about anything or anyone other than themselves, abuse the opportunity and stretch it into a non-timeout timeout: when there's a possession change. Between free throws. During a substitution. Any and every time they can, they abuse the situation to inflict a little bit more of their time-wasting supposed wisdom on their long-suffering players and fans and the officials. 

I say, during the last part of any basketball game -- maybe the last 2 minutes on the clock, maybe the last 5 minutes -- there should be no more time-outs. and no more non-timeout timeouts. Let the game clock roll after a basket is scored, just like early in the game. Also, don't stop the clock during substitutions. If a player takes too long to get on or off of the court during a substution, that's a technical.

And, the final brilliant nail in the coffin of this "game of chess" which is boring us all to death: every foul is a 2-shot technical foul, and the fouled team gets or retains possession of the ball. The only time the clock would stop would be for a foul. The coaches could still have their short non-timeout timeouts during these technical fouls, but not too long: put a 5-second limit on each shot. Exceed that limit and you forfeit all remaining free throws and the other team gets 2.

If a coach is ejected from the game, give him 5 seconds to get his precious prima-donna ass off of the court. Not 5 seconds to start moving off the court, but 5 seconds to get out of our sight, or it's an additional 2-shot technical. 10 seconds and we can still see or hear him? 2 2-shot technicals, 3 fouls for a 15-second delay, etc, etc. One more technical for coaching after being ejected. One delicious aspect of this rule would be that some of them still wouldn't be able to stop themselves from staying on the court and ranting and screaming like the spoiled little tittybabies they are.

An extra 2 shots for flagrant fouls. Etc, etc.

Why, the players would actually have to decide close games by actually playing basketball, with a strong incentive to play it clean and foul-free. 

You know what's already exciting because there already are no timeouts? CHESS!!

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Chess With Soul

An NBA basketball player, I believe it was Bobby Jones, who played for the Nuggets and the Sixers in the 70's and 80's, once said that pro basketball was like "chess with soul."

Well, eff that cracker! I'll tell you what's like chess with soul: good chess. I'll tell you something I hate: the end of an NBA basketball game with a close score, because of the many many fouls and timeouts causing it to draaaaaaaag. If it was up to me, when there was 5 minutes or less left on the clock there would be no more timeouts allowed and every foul would be a technical. Then we'd see some exciting down-to-the-wire fast-moving basketball action. Obviously, and unfortunately, it's not up to me at the moment, and so that leaves us with chess.

What? What's that? you ask. Fast-moving action, in chess?

That's right, Chester. Because most serious chess played today is blitz chess, with each side given a total of 3 to 10 minutes or so to make all their moves. You move, your clock stops winding down and your opponent's clock starts winding down, until he or she moves and his or her clock stops winding down and yours starts again. What's that? You say you need a time out to think things over? No! No! No timeouts! No breaks! No mercy! There might be 15 moves a side in the last 10 seconds, each side with 5 seconds and moving 3 times a second. That's not unheard of. That's way too fast for any commentator to tell you anything about what's going on while it's going on. The moves are recorded, you can study what happened afterward. While it's going on it's just a question of whether your brain can move fast enough to let your eyes see what's happening.

But hey. Blitz isn't even the fastest chess. There's lightning chess, with, say for instance, 1 minute per side. An average game might be about 40 moves per side long, that gives you an average of one and a half seconds to think about each move. If you get yourself into an effed-up position and you think about one move for, say, 5 seconds, that will seriously eat up your clock.

It's insane.

You can watch. You can watch right now. Go here and, if you don't want to play, if you just want to watch, enter "help observe" and dig it.

You're welcome for blowing your mind.